English

COMPARE
English

Direct comparison

ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 vs Keystone 3 Pro

Two air gap touch alternatives — Titan 2 QR-only without cable, Keystone 3 Pro with USB (MSRP 149 vs. USD 129).

What matters

Key differences to help you choose, without an overall score.

  1. ELLIPAL Titan 2.0

    • If you want to check transactions on a touchscreen and exchange them with the smartphone app via QR codes.
    • If you want to manage several chains and can do without a USB signing path.

  2. Keystone 3 Pro

    • If you want to check multi-chain transactions on a touchscreen and sign via QR codes with compatible wallet apps.
    • If you prefer a separate air-gapped workflow and do not need Bluetooth.

Features

Differences5

criterionELLIPAL Titan 2.0 hardware wallet with touch display and metallic seed plateELLIPAL Titan 2.0Keystone 3 Pro hardware wallet with color display and asset overviewKeystone 3 Pro
Connectivity✕USB
PlatformsiOS · AndroidWindows · macOS · Linux · iOS · Android
OS firmwareOpen source firmware: Whether the device firmware (in whole or in part) is publicly viewable. More transparency - no automatic proof of absolute security.✕partial
BackupBackup: How to restore the wallet — typical seed phrase (BIP39), SLIP39 parts or a manufacturer-specific procedure.Seed phrase ✓ · SLIP39 ✕ · Manufacturer backup ✕Seed phrase ✓ · SLIP39 ✓ · Manufacturer backup ✕
RRPUSD 149USD 129
To the offerAffiliate links
To the offer ↗
To the offer ↗
Shared features8
criterionELLIPAL Titan 2.0 hardware wallet with touch display and metallic seed plateELLIPAL Titan 2.0Keystone 3 Pro hardware wallet with color display and asset overviewKeystone 3 Pro
Form factorOtherOther
DisplayTouchTouch
iPhone signing✓✓
Air gapAir-Gap: The device signs without a direct network or permanent USB connection to the PC - typically via QR code or microSD. Less attack surface, more steps to use.✓✓
SESecure Element: Special chip for key material according to the manufacturer.✓✓
Bitcoin✓✓
Ethereum/EVMEVM: Ethereum Virtual Machine — Chains and tokens that work with Ethereum-compatible wallets and apps (including many layer 2).✓✓
Solana✓✓

Overview

Conclusion — Strengths, limitations and suitable uses. Your workflow and the functions it requires are what matter.

Editorial assessment

ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 and Keystone 3 Pro suit users who want to confirm transactions by QR on a touchscreen device. The specific wallet and asset workflow matters more than the air-gap label: check supported apps, transaction types and backup formats.

ELLIPAL Titan 2.0 centres on QR exchange with its smartphone app. It does not offer a USB signing path or Bluetooth. This suits a mobile app workflow but limits the choice of other connection paths.

Keystone 3 Pro works with several compatible wallet apps, including desktop wallets. Shamir backup is documented. Available functions depend on the firmware, asset and app; USB updates do not establish universal USB signing support.

Recorded list prices are USD 149 for Titan 2.0 and USD 129 for Keystone 3 Pro. Keystone therefore has the lower listed price; shipping, taxes, package contents and current offers also matter when buying.

For both hardware wallets, check whether your wallet app can display the required transaction fully on the device. Touch controls alone do not answer that question.

Compare alternatives

01

ELLIPAL Titan 2.0

Pros

  • Air gap as a core concept
  • Touch display and battery
  • Multi-chain including BTC, ETH/EVM and SOL
  • Secure Element with CC-EAL5+ manufacturer information
  • iOS and Android supported

Cons

  • In this comparison: Higher MSRP (USD 149)
  • Firmware and client not open source
  • No USB signature path
  • Desktop OS support unknown
  • Smartphone app is part of the workflow
  • No NFC

more suitable if...

  • If you want to check transactions on a touchscreen and exchange them with the smartphone app via QR codes.
  • If you want to manage several chains and can do without a USB signing path.
02

Keystone 3 Pro

Pros

  • In this comparison: MSRP USD 129
  • Air gap via QR and microSD
  • Touch display and battery
  • Multiple Secure Elements with CC-EAL5+ manufacturer information
  • Multi-chain including Solana
  • Fingerprint sensor and multi-seed
  • Shamir backup with multiple recovery shares is documented

Cons

  • Larger touchscreen device; no Bluetooth
  • A compatible wallet app is required for each asset; not every integration supports every feature
  • Check the backup format and firmware version before restoring

more suitable if...

  • If you want to check multi-chain transactions on a touchscreen and sign via QR codes with compatible wallet apps.
  • If you prefer a separate air-gapped workflow and do not need Bluetooth.

Sources & notes

Where to go next