English

COMPARE
English

Direct comparison

Ledger Nano X vs Trezor Safe 5

Mobile devices with a display - Bluetooth, touch and firmware openness in direct comparison.

What matters

Key differences to help you choose, without an overall score.

  1. Ledger Nano X

    • If you want to sign with an iPhone or Android device over Bluetooth and use Ledger apps.
    • If you want a compact device with a battery and can work with buttons and a closed firmware core.

  2. Trezor Safe 5

    • If you want to combine open firmware with touch controls in Trezor Suite.
    • If you want a SLIP39 multi-share backup and USB signing without requiring full iPhone signing.

Features

Differences7

criterionLedger Nano X hardware wallet with brushed metal cover and black housingLedger Nano XTrezor Safe 5 hardware wallet with touch display and green light ringsTrezor Safe 5
DisplaymonochromeTouch
ConnectivityUSB BluetoothUSB
PlatformsWindows · macOS · Linux · iOS · AndroidWindows · macOS · Linux · Android
iPhone signing✓restricted
OS firmwareOpen source firmware: Whether the device firmware (in whole or in part) is publicly viewable. More transparency - no automatic proof of absolute security.✕✓
BackupBackup: How to restore the wallet — typical seed phrase (BIP39), SLIP39 parts or a manufacturer-specific procedure.Seed phrase ✓ · SLIP39 ✕ · Manufacturer backup ✕Seed phrase ✓ · SLIP39 ✓ · Manufacturer backup ✕
RRPEUR 99EUR 169
To the offerAffiliate links
To the offer ↗
To the offer ↗
Shared features6
criterionLedger Nano X hardware wallet with brushed metal cover and black housingLedger Nano XTrezor Safe 5 hardware wallet with touch display and green light ringsTrezor Safe 5
Form factorUSB deviceUSB device
Air gapAir-Gap: The device signs without a direct network or permanent USB connection to the PC - typically via QR code or microSD. Less attack surface, more steps to use.✕✕
SESecure Element: Special chip for key material according to the manufacturer.✓✓
Bitcoin✓✓
Ethereum/EVMEVM: Ethereum Virtual Machine — Chains and tokens that work with Ethereum-compatible wallets and apps (including many layer 2).✓✓
Solana✓✓

Overview

Conclusion — Strengths, limitations and suitable uses. Your workflow and the functions it requires are what matter.

01

Ledger Nano X

Pros

  • In this comparison: RRP EUR 99
  • Bluetooth signing with iPhone and Android; USB on a computer
  • Compact device with its own screen and buttons
  • Multiple assets, including Solana, through compatible wallet apps

Cons

  • Small monochrome screen; no touch controls
  • Closed firmware core; client only partly open source
  • No QR air-gapped mode or NFC

Ledger Nano X is more suitable if...

  • If you want to sign with an iPhone or Android device over Bluetooth and use Ledger apps.
  • If you want a compact device with a battery and can work with buttons and a closed firmware core.
02

Trezor Safe 5

Pros

  • Touch display
  • Open-source firmware and client
  • Secure Element with CC-EAL6+ manufacturer information
  • SLIP39 Multi Share
  • Multi-coin support via Trezor Suite

Cons

  • In this comparison: Higher RRP (EUR 169)
  • ShipMonk breach: affected Trezor customers’ order data was exposed, increasing phishing risk. Trezor says devices and wallet keys were not affected.
  • No air gap
  • No Bluetooth; iOS only limited

Trezor Safe 5 is more suitable if...

  • If you want to combine open firmware with touch controls in Trezor Suite.
  • If you want a SLIP39 multi-share backup and USB signing without requiring full iPhone signing.

Sources & notes

Where to go next